common-lisp.net down?

[Pascal Costanza]

Content preview: Hi, It seems that common-lisp.net is down. Is that correct?
(Sorry for spamming this list, but I don't know who the current maintainer
is…) [...]

Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium
trust
[217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: pro-***@public.gmane.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp Professionals <pro.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pro>,
<mailto:pro-request-***@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/pro>
List-Post: <mailto:pro-***@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pro-request-***@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro>,
<mailto:pro-request-***@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pro-bounces-***@public.gmane.org
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview: Hi, It seems that common-lisp.net is down. Is that correct?
(Sorry for spamming this list, but I don't know who the current maintainer
is…) [...]

Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium
trust
[217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-pro/697>

Hi,

It seems that common-lisp.net is down. Is that correct?

(Sorry for spamming this list, but I don't know who the current maintainer is…)


Thanks,
Pascal

--
Pascal Costanza

[Jean-Philippe Paradis]

Content preview: Works for me. The site appears to have a new, cleaner look,
so I guess the downtime was due to an upgrade?... Though the site's news
doesn't mention this. pro mailing list //lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
[...]

Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
trust
[209.85.160.51 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(hexstream[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-pro/698>

Works for me. The site appears to have a new, cleaner look, so I guess
the downtime was due to an upgrade?... Though the site's news doesn't
mention this.

[Steve Haflich]

You mean the web site? It's working for me right now.
Yesterday (about 24 hours ago) there appear to have been some internet
disruptions from the solar flare. Might explain occasional failures.

[Pascal Costanza]

OK, thanks for the replies. I see the website working again as well.

Pascal

Post by Steve Haflich
You mean the web site? It's working for me right now.
Yesterday (about 24 hours ago) there appear to have been some internet disruptions from the solar flare. Might explain occasional failures.

--
Pascal Costanza