[Q] interpretation / byte-compilation / compilation

[Didier Verna]

Content preview: Hello, does anyone have a global view on the status of this
in the main CL implementations (SBCL, CMU-CL, ECL, CCL, CLISP, ABCL, ACL,
LispWorks). By that, I mean mostly: - which implementation can do what, -
how do you ask for interpretation, bytecomp or comp. [...]

Content analysis details: (-100.8 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list
-0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-pro/712>


Hello,

does anyone have a global view on the status of this in the main CL
implementations (SBCL, CMU-CL, ECL, CCL, CLISP, ABCL, ACL, LispWorks).
By that, I mean mostly:

- which implementation can do what,
- how do you ask for interpretation, bytecomp or comp.


I find this information quite hard to figure out. Unless I missed it, I
think it would be good to have a page somewhere summarizing this.

Thank you !

[Adrien Piérard]

Hi Didier,

Isn't http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation sufficient?

(I guess it's not, but it's a good start.)


P!

Post by Didier Verna
Hello,
does anyone have a global view on the status of this in the main CL
implementations (SBCL, CMU-CL, ECL, CCL, CLISP, ABCL, ACL, LispWorks).
- which implementation can do what,
- how do you ask for interpretation, bytecomp or comp.
I find this information quite hard to figure out. Unless I missed it, I
think it would be good to have a page somewhere summarizing this.
Thank you !
--
Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated.
Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com
_______________________________________________
pro mailing list
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro

[Didier Verna]

Content preview: Nick Levine wrote: >> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Adrien_Pi=E9rard?=
<axioplase-***@public.gmane.org> >> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:22:30 +0900 >> Cc: Common
Lisp pros <pro-***@public.gmane.org> >> >> Hi Didier, >> >> Isn't http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation
sufficient? >> >> (I guess it's not, but it's a good start.) > > It doesn't
mention the commercial lisps (ACL, LW, Scieneer). Dan > Weinreb's survey
(referenced from the cliki page) is much better. [...]

Content analysis details: (-100.8 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list
-0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-pro/715>

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:22:30 +0900
Hi Didier,
Isn't http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation sufficient?
(I guess it's not, but it's a good start.)

It doesn't mention the commercial lisps (ACL, LW, Scieneer). Dan
Weinreb's survey (referenced from the cliki page) is much better.

Yes, although a bit too verbose. Neither of them provide details on
how to request interpretation / bytecomp or comp for implementations
that provide several options. I guess what I'm looking for is more
"cookbook" style.

[Nick Levine]

Post by Didier Verna

Hi Didier, > > Isn't http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation

sufficient? > > (I guess it's not, but it's a good start.) [...]

Content analysis details: (-3.1 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium
trust
[94.229.129.33 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-pro/716>

Post by Didier Verna
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:22:30 +0900
Hi Didier,
Isn't http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation sufficient?
(I guess it's not, but it's a good start.)

It doesn't mention the commercial lisps (ACL, LW, Scieneer). Dan
Weinreb's survey (referenced from the cliki page) is much better.

- n